Radiometric dating for children

Posted by / 14-Sep-2019 06:57

Radiometric dating for children

There is little reason to doubt the accuracy of radiometric dating techniques.

Countless radiometric studies of rocks and other objects from all over the world confirm ages of tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands, millions, and billions of years old.

“Radiocarbon dating doesn’t work well on objects much older than twenty thousand years,” because background contamination radiation will disrupt the results.[xii] Others suggest that C-14 dating is accurate to about 40,000 or 50,000 years.[xiii] “C-14 is forming today faster than it’s decaying.

However, it has fluctuated up and down over the past ten thousand years.

If you would like to see if an AOI seminar is right for you, or you would like to help the work of Alpha Omega Institute, please visit our website events page or our donate page. [vii] Christopher Gregory Weber, Answers to Creationist Attacks on Carbon-14 Dating, Spring 1982, Vol 3, Num 2, Pages 23-29, accessed July 17, 2014.

[viii] Claim CD011.4, last modified July 8, 2004, The Talk Origins Archive, accessed August 7, 2014.

If your comment becomes an ad hominem argument and does not substantially address the issue, your comment will be disqualified as well.

Please comment on the ideas that are presented and not the presenter.They have their work cut out for them, however, because radiocarbon (C-14) dating is one of the most reliable of all the radiometric dating methods.”[iv] From observations, there are usually many daughter isotopes and evidence (including radiohalos) of those having come from parent isotopes, which are less abundant (which is to be expected).More radioactive decay has taken place within the rocks than could have occurred in just a few thousand years.YEC John Woodmorappe (a pseudonym), for example, has been at the forefront in misquoting and misrepresenting radiometric dating results from the geology and geochemistry literature.”[xviii] “The only way creationists can hang on to their chronology is to poke all the holes they can into radiocarbon dating. Do you have any disagreements or concerns or additions?However, as we have seen, it has survived their most ardent attacks.”[xix] by Brian Mariani and others Is the above correct? Before commenting, please read the following disclosures.

radiometric dating for children-25radiometric dating for children-51radiometric dating for children-61

To suggest that the amount of radioactive decay we observe has occurred within 6,000 years, or even that the majority occurred due to a worldwide flood, is preposterous. Creationists claim that there are many examples where radiometric dating has supposedly been shown to be unreliable.

One thought on “radiometric dating for children”